Evaluate the biopsychosocial model of health and well-being.

Refer to the paper 2 assessment criteria when awarding marks. These can be found under the “Your tests” tab > supplemental materials.

The command term “evaluate” requires candidates to make an appraisal by weighing up the strengths and limitations of the biopsychosocial model of health and well-being. Although a discussion of both strengths and limitations is required, it does not have to be evenly balanced to gain high marks.

The biopsychosocial model has been widely accepted in the field of health psychology. It takes into consideration biological factors, psychological factors, sociocultural factors, as well as the behaviours of an individual when considering how to reduce health risks, prevent illnesses, and promote healthy ways of living. The goal of this model is to find ways to help people stay healthy and to accept and commit to treatment methods for health problems.

Relevant studies may include but are not limited to:

• Hoffman and Driscoll’s (2000) study on health promotion and disease prevention
• Engel’s (1978) study on the biopsychosocial model and education of health professionals
• Cohen and Koenig’s (2003) study on religion and the biopsychosocial model of health and ageing
• Hatala’s (2012) study on the status of the biopsychosocial model in health psychology.

Evaluation points may include, but are not limited to:

• alternative/contrary explanations
• the accuracy and clarity of the model
• productivity of the model in generating psychological research
• methodological, cultural, and gender considerations
• reductionist versus holistic conceptualizations of health
• applications of the model.

If the candidate addresses only strengths or only limitations, the response should be awarded up to a maximum of [3] for criterion D: critical thinking. All remaining criteria should be awarded marks according to the best fit approach.