Date | May 2019 | Marks available | 8 | Reference code | 19M.3.HL.TZ0.3 |
Level | HL | Paper | 3 (model questions) | Time zone | no time zone |
Command term | Discuss | Question number | 3 | Adapted from | N/A |
Question
Students should be provided with the pre-release document ahead of the May 2019 HL paper 3 examination, this can be found under the "Your tests" tab > supplemental materials > May 2019 HL paper 3 pre-release document: AV.
Mobility challenges for the elderly, young, disadvantaged, and handicapped.
Source 1: Miketon
Miketon is a small town with a population of 5000. It has one taxi company with two drivers who are about to retire. There are no plans for the taxi company to continue. The town council is aware that this will create problems for the elderly citizens who live in the community. The council predicts that this problem will grow, as there are increasing numbers of elderly people retiring to the area.
Miketon is 20 km from the regional centre, Towbro, which has a population of 300 000. As a result of this closeness, it is also popular with young families, as it is within commuting* distance (see Figure 1).
Figure 1: Map showing the locations of Miketon and Towbro
The loss of the taxi service and an infrequent bus service to Towbro will create problems for both the elderly, who need access to the hospital, and for teenagers who wish to attend cultural and sporting events in Towbro.
* Commuting: to travel some distance between one's home and place of work on a regular basis.
Source 2: Miketon Town Council
Miketon Town Council wants to solve this problem and has two suggestions they will put forward at the next council meeting.
- A fleet of autonomous vehicles is purchased by the council that could be used by anyone in the town at a subsidized rate. All bookings would be made through the council website or the council transport app. The autonomous vehicles would easily cover the distances between the regional centre and other locations.
- A ride-share company is invited to start operations in Miketon. To entice companies and local drivers to participate, the council would subsidize the trips by paying a surcharge (an amount added to the fare), which would be credited to the ride-share drivers and company.
Both suggestions have advantages as well as limitations.
Source 3: Readiness for autonomous vehicles
Each country can be graded using criteria that determine how ready it is for autonomous vehicles. The grade can be either very ready, ready, or not ready. Four of the criteria used to determine the readiness of the country in which Miketon is located are shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2: Criteria and scores for the country in which Miketon is located
Source 4: A pilot study of a ride-sharing scheme called Rideshare
The findings of the Rideshare pilot scheme (see Figure 3), show that by carefully designing the integration of ride sharing with public transport services, the ride-sharing scheme can be successful to a significant extent.
Figure 3 Rideshare board
Three features of the Rideshare pilot scheme were:
- It was developed and implemented with the support of the local council and citizens.
- Ride-sharing notice boards with information about the services were placed at local bus stops and in railway stations to promote the use of these services in an integrated way.
- The pricing strategy ensured that ride sharing was so expensive that it deterred people from using it and not too cheap that it stopped people using public transport.
It was recently reported that an autonomous vehicle had collided with an elderly person in a wheelchair that had rolled into the road. The autonomous vehicle chose to run over the wheelchair rather than avoid it, as swerving would have put two children at risk. This incident led to a discussion in the council about the ethical decision-making process used by the autonomous vehicle.
Discuss who should be accountable for an accident in the town involving an autonomous vehicle.
Markscheme
Answers may include:
Possible stakeholders include: car manufacturers, the council that purchased the vehicles and controls its use, the elderly person, and the two children and their parents.
For the car manufacturer to be accountable:
- They designed the decision-making process (values).
- The car should be able to operate safely under all conditions (systems).
- The manufacturer should have provided information to the council and the optimum operating circumstances for the autonomous vehicles (policies).
For the council to be accountable:
- The council should have checked the limitations of the autonomous vehicles and made regulations for their use to suit them, e.g., the speed of autonomous vehicles if such an incident occurs (systems, policies).
- The council should have set up the road condition such that the autonomous vehicles would not encounter such a situation, by restricting the movements and speed of autonomous vehicles (systems, policies).
For the elderly person to be accountable:
- They should have more control over their wheelchair / can be proved they were negligent.
For the children and their parents to be accountable:
- The children should not have been close to a dangerous road.
- The parents should have supervised their children better.
Note to examiners: When discussing who is accountable, a range of stakeholders need to be considered with a balance of reasons why they might be accountable as opposed to a different stakeholder. A minimum of three stakeholders would be expected for the higher markbands.
Keywords: change, power, systems, ethics, values, autonomous, policies, laws, regulations, reliability.
Please refer to the HL paper 3 question 3 markbands when awarding marks. These can be found under the "Your tests" tab > supplemental materials > Digital society markbands and guidance document.