User interface language: English | Español

Date May 2021 Marks available 15 Reference code 21M.1.SL.TZ2.3
Level Standard level Paper Paper 1 Time zone Time zone 2
Command term Evaluate Question number 3 Adapted from N/A

Question

Explain why cyclical (demand-deficient) unemployment may occur in an economy.

[10]
a.

Evaluate the effectiveness of interventionist supply-side policies in reducing the level of unemployment in an economy.

[15]
b.

Markscheme

Marks should be allocated according to the paper 1 markbands for May 2013 forward, part A.

Answers may include:

a.

Marks should be allocated according to the paper 1 markbands for May 2013 forward, part B.

Answers may include:

Evaluation may include: the importance of the type of unemployment (e.g. demand-deficient unemployment may be more directly reduced through expansionary monetary and fiscal policies); consideration of the effectiveness of supply-side policies (e.g. in terms of time lags, the ability to create employment, the impact on the government’s budget deficit, opportunity cost); government investment in new technologies (e.g. robotics/artificial intelligence) may lead to displacement of labour.

b.

Examiners report

There were some very strong answers to this question, with many students explaining how cyclical unemployment occurs during a recession when aggregate demand falls, and unemployment rises. These answers were effectively illustrated with aggregate demand and supply diagrams. Real-world examples often prove more difficult for students in macroeconomic questions, but there were still some effective examples from different countries where unemployment has increased because the current pandemic (at the time of writing) caused recession and a fall in aggregate demand. 

a.

This question also produced some effective responses, with candidates showing a good understanding of the way interventionist supply-side policies can reduce unemployment. The strongest answers considered how state-provided education and training, employment subsidies and government-financed employment exchanges can reduce different types of unemployment. The answers were illustrated by showing an increase in the long-run aggregate supply curve, along with real-world examples of the use of interventionist supply-side policies. Large numbers of students evaluated their answers by considering the costs and relative effectiveness of the interventionist supply-side approach. The best responses also discussed the relative merits of alternative policy options such as monetary and fiscal policy, along with a market-based supply-side approach. 

b.

Syllabus sections

Last exams 2021 » Section 2: Macroeconomics » 2.6 Supply-side policies » Evaluation of supply-side policies » The strengths and weaknesses of supply-side policies
Last exams 2021 » Section 2: Macroeconomics » 2.6 Supply-side policies » Evaluation of supply-side policies
First exams 2022 » Unit 3: Macroeconomics » 3.7 Supply-side policies » 3.7.6 Effectiveness of supply-side policies
Last exams 2021 » Section 2: Macroeconomics » 2.6 Supply-side policies
First exams 2022 » Unit 3: Macroeconomics » 3.7 Supply-side policies
Last exams 2021 » Section 2: Macroeconomics
First exams 2022 » Unit 3: Macroeconomics
First exams 2022
Last exams 2021

View options