User interface language: English | Español

Date May 2021 Marks available 15 Reference code 21M.1.SL.TZ1.1
Level Standard level Paper Paper 1 Time zone Time zone 1
Command term Evaluate Question number 1 Adapted from N/A

Question

Explain how the price mechanism reallocates resources when there is a decrease in the supply of a good.

[10]
a.

Evaluate the view that the threat to sustainability, caused by economic activity requiring the use of fossil fuels, is best addressed through the use of carbon taxes.

[15]
b.

Markscheme

Marks should be allocated according to the paper 1 markbands for May 2013 forward, part A.

Answers may include:

a.

Marks should be allocated according to the paper 1 markbands for May 2013 forward, part B.

Answers may include:

Evaluation may include: possible advantages and disadvantages of the use of carbon taxes, consideration of other available policy options such as cap and trade schemes and funding for clean technologies, assessment of “best”.

A maximum of [12] should be awarded if there is not at least some reference to other policies.

Examiners should be aware that candidates may take a different approach which, if appropriate, should be rewarded.

b.

Examiners report

Generally, this question was not answered well by a majority of the candidates. While many candidates were able to explain the mechanics of a decrease in supply in terms of the leftward shift of the supply curve, the subsequent increase in price and decrease in quantity demanded, few were able to extend this analysis further by relating it to the signalling and incentive functions of price and the impact on resource reallocation. In addition, definitions of supply, price mechanism and resources were often absent and good developed examples were rarely provided. 

a.

Again, good definitions were often lacking and the terms "sustainability" and "carbon tax" were not usually defined well by the candidates, if at all. On the plus side, candidates often demonstrated an understanding that taxes reduce supply and thus the quantity of fossil fuels produced but were often unable to explain the emission of carbon as a negative externality. If the term negative externality was mentioned at all, it was often not diagrammed well. The best responses were also able to discuss alternative policies to carbon taxes and to reach a considered judgment about "best".  

b.

Syllabus sections

Last exams 2021 » Section 1: Microeconomics » 1.4 Market failure » Types of market failure » Common access resources and the threat to sustainability
Last exams 2021 » Section 1: Microeconomics » 1.4 Market failure » Types of market failure
First exams 2022 » Unit 2: Microeconomics » 2.8 Market failure—externalities and common pool or common access resources » 2.8.2 Government intervention
First exams 2022 » Unit 2: Microeconomics » 2.8 Market failure—externalities and common pool or common access resources » 2.8.3 Strengths and limitations of government policies to correct externalities and Strengths and limitations of government intervention
Last exams 2021 » Section 1: Microeconomics » 1.4 Market failure
First exams 2022 » Unit 2: Microeconomics » 2.8 Market failure—externalities and common pool or common access resources
Last exams 2021 » Section 1: Microeconomics
First exams 2022 » Unit 2: Microeconomics
First exams 2022
Last exams 2021

View options