With reference to two wars in the period 750–1500, to what extent was economic change the most significant effect of war?

The question requires that candidates consider the merits or otherwise of the suggestion that economic change was the most significant effect of war. The two wars may or may not be from the same region. Effects may extend beyond the timeframe, but they must be clearly linked to the issue raised in the question. Candidates may choose to focus on the negative economic effects of wars. They may consider the direct or indirect financial costs involved in waging a war. Similarly, they may discuss the impact of population decline or damage to resources, as caused by Tamerlane in Georgia. Conversely, candidates may focus on the economic benefits to victors. These may include control of conquered territories and their resources. Other appropriate examples may include access to tributes, such as yizia imposed by Harun al-Rashid, or ransom such as the one paid by King John II of France. Candidates may also choose to discuss the benefits of an increase in trade. Other relevant factors may be addressed, for example social, religious and cultural changes, but with a focus on the issue in the question. Candidates’ opinions or conclusions will be presented clearly and supported by appropriate evidence.

The question required that candidates consider the merits or otherwise of the suggestion that economic change was the most significant effect of war.