Date | November 2020 | Marks available | 6 | Reference code | 20N.1.BP.TZ0.19 |
Level | Both SL and HL | Paper | Paper 1 - first exams 2017 | Time zone | TZ0 |
Command term | Compare and contrast | Question number | 19 | Adapted from | N/A |
Question
Source R Tim Judah, a reporter and political analyst, writing in the academic book Kosovo: What Everyone Needs to Know (2008).
On January 22, 1998, the police tried to arrest Adem Jashari, but failed. One month later, as tensions continued to mount, the United States special envoy to the region criticized Serbian police violence but also described the KLA as a terrorist group. Perhaps Slobadan Milosevic interpreted this as an invitation to act. Fighting began in the village of Likosane [Likoshan] on February 28. It culminated a few days later when Serbian security forces finally took Adem Jashari’s family compound. He was killed, along with members of his extended family and others, making a total of 51 dead. There was no going back. Jashari’s image, with bushy beard and white, domed Albanian hat, would be found everywhere and the man himself elevated to the status of a saint.
Kosovar Albanians were overtaken by conflicting emotions. Fear was one of them, but another, euphoria, was stronger, especially as the KLA began to take territory in central Drenica and in the west. More and more young men began to trek over the mountains to Albania to collect weapons, and more and more people began to donate to the KLA instead of contributing to [Ibrahim] Rugova’s fund.
[Source: Judah, T., 2008. Kosovo What Everyone Needs to Know Copyright © 2008 by Tim Judah.
Reproduced with permission of the Licensor through PLSclear.]
Source S R Craig Nation, a professor of Russian and Eurasian Studies, writing in the academic book War in the Balkans 1991–2002 (2003).
The KLA’s strength at the beginning of 1998 was estimated at around 500 active members … [and] would probably not have become a major threat, had it not been for two events. The first was the collapse of the Albanian government in the spring of 1997. In the ensuing riots, weapons were looted and as many as a million light arms were distributed among the [Albanian] population. Many of these weapons ended in the hands of KLA fighters, smuggled across the mountains dividing Albania from Kosovo.
The second event was the decision by Serbian authorities to launch a campaign to suppress armed resistance. A police action on January 22, 1998, failed to arrest Adem Jashari, the head of a powerful clan in the Drenica region who had become a symbol of local independence. An armed assault against the Jashari clan followed, leaving 58 people dead.
The bloodbath had the predictable effect of galvanizing [stimulating] resentment, and the KLA grew rapidly. Within Kosovo, however, lightly armed militants were no match for the disciplined military forces of a modern state. In June 1998, the Serbian Army launched a counter offensive, with over 40 000 troops operating with tanks, helicopters, heavy artillery, and mortar fire, that gathered momentum as it progressed. By late summer, it seemed to be on the verge of breaking organized resistance once and for all.
[Source: Nation, R.C., 2003. War in the Balkans 1991–2002. Strategic Studies Institute, p. 227.]
Compare and contrast what Sources R and S reveal about the conflict in Kosovo.
Markscheme
Apply the markbands that provide the “best fit” to the responses given by candidates and award credit wherever it is possible to do so. The following material is an indication of what candidates may elect to write about in their responses. It is neither prescriptive nor exhaustive and no set answer is required.
Comparisons:
- Both sources state that the failed attempt to arrest Adem Jashari contributed to the conflict.
- Both state that the brutal attack on the Jashari clan in March was a turning point in the conflict, strengthening support for the KLA.
- Both state that Adem Jashari was or became a symbol of resistance for Kosovan Albanians.
- Both state that weapons came from Albania into Kosovo, contributing to increased violence.
Contrasts:
- Source R highlights the role of the United States in the conflict, whereas Source S focuses on the regional factors.
- Source R suggests the KLA were gaining in strength, whereas Source S suggests the Serbian army was far superior.
Examiners report
There was continued improvement in the approach by candidates to the third question this session. The majority attempted to identify comparisons and contrasts, and in line with the requirements of the question, wrote a running commentary of similarities and differences. Indeed, it was pleasing to find that responses offered several valid similarities and differences. Candidates should be made aware that for the top markband, more than two developed linkage points between the sources should be established, for example two developed comparisons and two developed contrasts.
Some responses lacked clarity and/or development; points of comparison and contrast should have clear reference to the source content. A minority of candidates wrote accounts that described the content of each source without explicitly identifying comparisons and contrasts.