Discuss the impact of the mobilization of human and economic resources on the outcome of two wars.

The question requires that candidates offer a considered and balanced review of the impact of the mobilization of human and economic resources on the outcome of two wars. For human resources, candidates may consider the conscription of adult males; the conscription of women to replace men in the workforce. For economic resources, candidates may refer to government control over resources and production; the sale of war bonds; the rationing of food in order to supply both the Home Front and the military. Both world wars may be used as examples although different theatres in the First or Second World War may not be used as different wars. Alternatively, candidates may consider other factors that may have been more important in impacting the outcome of the chosen wars, for example, a war may have been won because of superior strategies; the impact of charismatic leadership on morale and unity; or the use of more effective technology. The focus, however, must remain on the mobilization of human and economic resources. Candidates’ opinions and conclusions will be presented clearly and supported by appropriate evidence.

The question required that candidates offer a considered and balanced review of the impact of the mobilization of human and economic resources on the outcome of two wars. This proved to be a rather demanding question for many candidates who described military mobilization by different sides, neglecting to mention other ways in which the remainder of the population was mobilized. Stronger responses demonstrated sound knowledge of "total war" and referred to the employment of women; the adaptation of industry to war production; and other ways in which governments garnered a nation's human and economic resources.