User interface language: English | Español

Date May 2017 Marks available 15 Reference code 17M.3op3.HL.TZ0.15
Level Higher level only Paper Paper 3 (History of Asia and Oceania) Time zone TZ0
Command term Discuss Question number 15 Adapted from N/A

Question

“Settlement schemes in Australia and New Zealand were too ambitious and often ended in failure.” Discuss.

Markscheme

Candidates will offer a considered and balanced review of the statement, with which they may agree, partially agree or disagree. Candidates will choose case studies from both Australia and New Zealand. Candidates may adopt an approach that outlines examples of settlement schemes in one country followed by those of the other. Alternatively, candidates may choose a thematic or a comparative approach and discuss the statement in areas such as different theories about land distribution and labour supply, penal settlements, government schemes to attract free settlers and women, private and church ventures, and chartered companies. Candidates are likely to review the aims and outcomes of various schemes in their discussion.

Examiners report

[N/A]

Syllabus sections

HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 3: History of Asia and Oceania » 8: British colonialism and emerging national identities in Oceania (1788–1919) » Settlement schemes; immigration to Australia and New Zealand; early colonial settlements; land distribution; pastoral society; squatters and the Selection Acts
HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 3: History of Asia and Oceania » 8: British colonialism and emerging national identities in Oceania (1788–1919)
HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 3: History of Asia and Oceania
HL options: first exams 2017

View options