User interface language: English | Español

Date May 2017 Marks available 15 Reference code 17M.3op1.HL.TZ0.28
Level Higher level only Paper Paper 3 (History of Africa and the Middle East) Time zone TZ0
Command term Compare and contrast Question number 28 Adapted from N/A

Question

Compare and contrast the results of United Nations (UN) intervention in Congo and Mozambique.

Markscheme

Candidates will give an account of the similarities and differences between the results of United Nations (UN) intervention in Congo and in Mozambique, referring to both throughout. Candidates may refer to positive and negative results, or they may categorize the results in terms of their social, political and/or economic impact. Candidates may argue that the intervention in both countries was largely successful, largely a failure, or that one was more successful than the other. Both similarities and differences must be clearly indicated but there does not need to be an equal number of each. Similarities may include success in stabilising war-torn countries, maintaining their territorial integrity and providing humanitarian support. Differences may include the fact that Congo later returned to civil war while Mozambique remained peaceful, and the fact that the intervention in Congo was less successful, due in part to a lack of international support for the mission.

Examiners report

[N/A]

Syllabus sections

HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 1: History of Africa and the Middle East » 14: Africa, international organizations and the international community (20th century) » Africa and the UN: Congo, Mozambique, Somalia and Rwanda: reasons for successes and failures; wider impact
HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 1: History of Africa and the Middle East » 14: Africa, international organizations and the international community (20th century)
HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 1: History of Africa and the Middle East
HL options: first exams 2017

View options