User interface language: English | Español

Date May 2017 Marks available 15 Reference code 17M.2.BP.TZ0.20
Level Both SL and HL Paper Paper 2 - first exams 2017 Time zone TZ0
Command term Compare and contrast Question number 20 Adapted from N/A

Question

Compare and contrast the methods used to maintain power in two authoritarian states, each from a different region.

Markscheme

Candidates will give an account of the similarities and differences between the methods of maintaining power that were employed in two authoritarian states referring to both states throughout the response. While the focus of the response must be within the timeframe of this topic, the periods covered do not need be contemporaneous. However, each of the examples chosen must be from a different region. Methods to be considered might include, but need not be limited to, political, legal or social methods. These may have been effective or ineffective or a combination of both but the response must not be a descriptive list of policies, for example, without some assessment of how these helped or hindered the maintenance of power within each state.

Examiners report

[N/A]

Syllabus sections

World history topics: first exams 2017 » 10. Authoritarian states (20th century) » Consolidation and maintenance of power » Use of legal methods; use of force; charismatic leadership; dissemination of propaganda
World history topics: first exams 2017 » 10. Authoritarian states (20th century) » Consolidation and maintenance of power » Nature, extent and treatment of opposition
World history topics: first exams 2017 » 10. Authoritarian states (20th century) » Consolidation and maintenance of power » The impact of the success and/or failure of foreign policy on the maintenance of power
World history topics: first exams 2017 » 10. Authoritarian states (20th century) » Consolidation and maintenance of power
World history topics: first exams 2017 » 10. Authoritarian states (20th century)
World history topics: first exams 2017

View options