User interface language: English | Español

Date May 2017 Marks available 15 Reference code 17M.2.BP.TZ0.3
Level Both SL and HL Paper Paper 2 - first exams 2017 Time zone TZ0
Command term Examine Question number 3 Adapted from N/A

Question

Examine the significance of two leaders to the course/practice of warfare.

Markscheme

Candidates will consider the significance of two leaders in terms of their impact on the course and/or practice of warfare during the period indicated by the timeframe of this topic. The two individuals chosen need not be contemporaneous and they may or may not be chosen from the same state or region. Although the focus of candidates’ responses will be to uncover the interrelationship between the leaders’ actions and the course/practice of warfare in which they were engaged, other factors may be introduced to contextualise and/or gauge the significance of the chosen leaders. Each leader may be considered separately or a thematic approach may be used if candidates wish to compare the relative significance of the two leaders to the course/practice of warfare.

Examiners report

[N/A]

Syllabus sections

World history topics: first exams 2017 » 10. Authoritarian states (20th century) » Emergence of authoritarian states » Conditions in which authoritarian states emerged: economic factors; social division; impact of war; weakness of political system
World history topics: first exams 2017 » 10. Authoritarian states (20th century) » Emergence of authoritarian states
World history topics: first exams 2017 » 2. Causes and effects of wars (750–1500) » Course, practices and outcomes
World history topics: first exams 2017 » 2. Causes and effects of wars (750–1500)
World history topics: first exams 2017 » 10. Authoritarian states (20th century)
World history topics: first exams 2017

View options